Recent Articles
Related Articles

Recent Articles By Rebecca Meiser

  • Actually, Crime Does Pay
    How to find fame and fortune by hacking into MySpace.
  • Buzz Kill
    A mysterious killer is stalking the land. Only Super Bee can save us.
  • Racism Reversed
    A black police chief accuses a black mayor of discriminating against whites.
  • The Attitude Adjuster
    Whoever said money can't buy happiness never met Jim Smith.
  • Mother's Keeper
    Lisa Hall spent her life protecting her sick, thieving mom. Even when the police came calling.

National Features

  • Miami New Times
    Perez Hilton: Exposed!

    Can a "crazy, flamboyant dork" from Miami find happiness as a Hollywood mudslinger?

    By Francisco Alvarado
  • Nashville Scene
    Chip Off the Old Rock

    Songwriter Justin Townes Earle has struggled with addiction--just like his proud papa.

    By Michael McCall
  • Phoenix New Times
    "Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy"

    Have they become the magic words when a state wants to terminate parental rights?

    By Megan Irwin
  • SF Weekly
    Out of the Woodwork

    Union carpenters describe a little slice of Jim Crow smack dab in the middle of America's most PC city.

    By Lauren Smiley

Even as the Tutela Patrimonio Cuturale, known as the TPC, went after the major players, there'd been rumblings that Cleveland was on its short list of targeted museums. During the trial of dealer Robert Hecht, the Italians cited eight pieces Hecht had sold to Cleveland. And after the Metropolitan Museum agreed to return six works, Maurizio Fiorilli, an Italian prosecutor, noted that his country's focus was moving toward larger museums in Ohio.

But while Princeton, Boston, and Virginia rushed to make conciliatory announcements, Cleveland was largely silent. "I think the whole issue with the Apollo might have something to do with how they're choosing to deal with this," says one insider with close ties to the Cleveland museum.

The art world could only guess which pieces the Italians might have in their sights. Topping the list was the Medea calyx krater, a vase created in the fourth century B.C., one of the few works to have survived the period.

Up until 1990, the vase was part of the private collection of brothers Nelson and William Hunt, whose family made its fortune in oil. In the 1980s, they'd been caught violating securities laws by trying to corner the silver market. Each was fined $10 million.

To help cover the bill, the brothers put the Medea up for sale. Cleveland jumped, allegedly paying $400,000. The problem, however, was that the Hunts had acquired the work through Bob Hecht.

Cleveland had also bought a fourth century B.C. oil flask from Hecht. The piece features the Greek god Pan presenting a hare to an elegantly dressed woman. During Hecht's trial, the Italians alleged that the flask was one of 94 pieces the dealer had illegally trafficked.

But Cleveland officials refused to publicly discuss Italy's inquiries. Then late last year, Suzan Mazur, an investigative journalist who first reported the Medea's suspect provenance, produced a list of the items the TPC wanted returned from Cleveland. It covered more than 27 works — including a marble bust of Emperor Balbinus from the third century A.D. and a bronze statue of an Etruscan warrior from around 500 B.C.

Also on the list was the Apollo. It seems the Italians believed that the statue was rightfully theirs, claiming that it had been recovered from its national waters.

If the list was accurate, it meant the TPC were hoping to secure millions worth of art from Cleveland, gutting the museum's modest Roman collection.

Cleveland refuses to comment, other than to say it's held discussions with Italy. "It's supposed to be a confidential document," says spokesman James Kopniske. "I don't even know what's on it."

But talking to Bennett, one gets the sense that the museum won't be quick to wave a white flag. "Our policy is really straightforward," he says. "Anyone at anytime" can protest an item's status. And "If someone has information that proves [the piece was illegally purchased], the museum has an obligation to look at that evidence . . . The Cleveland Museum of Art wants to know as much as possible about the items in our exhibits."

At the same time, Bennett claims that all pieces are vigorously researched. Just because a dealer is charged doesn't mean all his deals were tainted. Hecht's case is ongoing.

But it's worth noting that in the half-dozen or so instances that a work has been challenged, Cleveland has yet to return a piece.

Today, the Apollo rests securely in the nether regions of the museum. There it will sit until the doors open in 2010 to a new Greek and Roman exhibit.

Meanwhile, life continues in its normal frenzy for Bennett. Between organizing new exhibits, he's working on a book about the Apollo. And later this month, he'll be touring Europe again.

He's very excited. After all, he says, brown eyes sparkling like winter ice, you never know what treasures might be unearthed.

Write Your Comment show comments (5)
  1. Great article! This Apollo instantly grabbed my attention, since I took Prof. Niels' course on Greek Sculpture. I highly recommend that anyone who likes this enroll in art history at CWRU. Some of the profs are even cool enough to get access for their class to works that aren't on public display. I've gotten to analyze a lot of million+ dollar items from a few inches away. It's great to get an idea of material and craftsmanship that photographs can't even approximate.

    Also, this issue of acquisition and "where art belongs" is a big deal, so profs are always willing to discuss it. "Priceless" works do in fact have a price, and they certainly don't materialize from thin air!

  2. It is about time somebody stood up to dubious claims and refused to be bullied. The liberal bent of the U. S. affects every facet of life these days and the Cleveland is doing the right thing - not letting some so-called evidence allow them to be intimidated.

    Keep the Apollo at the Cleveland!

  3. Traditionally what happens in expensive antiquities transactions is the following: curator /museum director take big tax free bribe pay day in Switzerland or Monaco (often int the millions) for acquiring art with twitch (aka fake) provenance from deales known for such things. (see the Getty Museum and Marion True). Everyone lives happily thereafter much richer for it. Now thngs have changed there is scrutiny. Nothing much else happens but curators and directors (who knw/know exactly what they are doing are criticized. I know this is harsh but for stealing all the money they do when they buy clearly smuggled items it is the least that could happen to them.

    THey should of course all go to jail for long long terms but gentlemen don't put gentlemen and harvard men in particular get free passes.

  4. "Liberal"? What is "liberal" about obeying the law? Looting is illegal for a reason; it destroys valuable historical evidence (which is priceless) for the sake of the greed of collectors who want to boost their own egos by cultural appropriation. The fact that a museum curator feels comfortable buying pieces with NO documentation on their history or provenance ("oh, a nice German family owned it, they used this priceless piece of history as a birdbath") from disreputable sources just goes to show how corrupt the system is.

    This article shows a shamefully clear bias against the Italian and Greek governments' efforts to (rightly) reclaim their cultural heritage.

  5. I liked this article. But honestly, I have to say that I am split on this issue of rightful ownership. I agree that items stolen and then sold to others is wrong. But at least in the case of the Apollo, it seems that the Cleveland museum did a lot of research to solidify its claim of rightful purchase. Although if countries like Italy and Greece have the right to the items simply by "Cultural Heritage", then all greek item across the world, no matter who owns them, should then be returned to Greece. And similar for all Roman works to Rome. For that matter all Midevil British works should return to Britain and so forth and so on... I think that is taking this argument too far. If you can explicitly prove an item was stolen, with full documentable proof, then I agree the item should be returned. BUT I do not like countries bullying museums, which do loads of restoration and maintenance on these works, to just take back any items they think are worth it. Museum in all countries are the ones keeping this history around for the next generations, countries should be working with them not against them to maintain documentation and research on these items.

Cleveland Scene Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff